Factors associated with willingness of parents to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 in primary care clinics in Cavite: A cross-sectional study

Background@#The recent inclusion of the pediatric population aged 12-17 years old in the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines in the country is necessary in order to increase vaccine coverage, and eventually achieve herd immunity. Vaccination of those in this age group is dependent on the vaccine acceptance of their parents or respective caregivers.@*Objective@#The study’s primary aim was to determine factors associated with parents’ intent to vaccinate their children against COVID-19. Specifically, this study aims to determine: 1. parent and child factors that influence the parents willingness to have their children vaccinated, 2. external factors in the decision to vaccinate their children, that is, if it is recommended by the doctor or school, and 3. concerns of parents regarding vaccination@*Methods@#A multi-clinic cross-sectional analytic study design was used. Respondents were parents in select Healthway Family Clinics in Cavite. Data were gathered via self-administered questionnaires, adapted and modified with permission from the authors of The COVID States Project. Data were analyzed using Epi Info 7.@*Results@#Among 350 respondents, 73.71% are most likely to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 once the vaccine becomes available to them. The major parental concerns are: long term health effects (56.29%), whether it has been tested enough (54.86%), immediate side effects (54.57%), and whether the vaccine actually works (54%). There is an association between the willingness of parents to vaccinate their children with the age and COVID-19 vaccination status of parent, and age and EPI immunization status of the child. Parents consider doctors’ and school’s recommendations to be very important factors in their decision to vaccinate their children@*Conclusion@#Majority of participants are likely to have their children vaccinated. Knowledge of associated factors and parental concerns gives the researchers better understanding of vaccine hesitancy amongst parents. This is vital to promote vaccination in the clinic setting, and on a much larger scale, in the local and national government’s public health strategies.

The effectiveness of community-based interventions in the control of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction@#Uncontrolled hypertension can lead to increased morbidity and mortality secondary to end-organ damage. Community-based health interventions promote health changes in a community setting and have been shown to promote better and more cost-effective healthcare. Existing meta-analyses on community-based interventions in hypertension control are confined to a certain country, have high risks of bias, and have shown heterogeneous results. A gap in the applicability of these conclusions necessitates the present study@*Objective@#Synthesize available evidence on the effectiveness of community-based interventions in addition to standard of care in the control of blood pressure among hypertensive adults.@*Methods@#A meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials among hypertensive adults was conducted. A literature search from various search engines and electronic databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Proquest, medRvix, and Grey literature was done by the investigators. Separate forest plots were generated for each desired outcome.@*Results@#Six studies were included. The pooled estimates showed a trend in favor of community-based interventions in the control of blood pressure [RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.19, p = 0.37], reduction of systolic blood pressure, reduction of diastolic blood pressure [MD = -2.52, 95% CI -3.64 to -1.28, p < 0.001] and medication adherence [RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.93, p = 0.0025]. However, there was high heterogeneity across studies. Subgroup analysis showed a favorable trend with lower heterogeneity in decreasing diastolic BP in particular, among community health worker-led interventions, and those involving health education and/or physical activity@*Conclusions/Recommendations@#Adherence to the current standard of care in the management of hypertension is still advised. There appears to be a trend towards control of blood pressure with community-based interventions; and a reduction of diastolic blood pressure with interventions that are led by community health workers involving health education and/or physical activity. There is a need to empower community health workers and conduct additional studies on the specific community-based interventions targeting communities as a whole whenever resources and current health restrictions allow

Using a systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical decision

@#A systematic review summarizes the results of a number of individual studies that address a focused clinical question. It may be accompanied by a meta-analysis, which is a quantitative method of combining the results of all these studies in order to come up with a summary statistic of the overall effect of an intervention. Single studies may be unrepresentative of the total body of evidence, that is why combining the results of several studies in a systematic review increases precision, provides better estimates of effect, and includes a greater range of patients thus facilitating better clinical decision making. This must be done in a systematic and reproducible manner.

Decisions on what diagnostic tests to request

@#In Evidence-based Family Practice, requesting a diagnostic test should be based on two issues. First is whether the test is accurate and thus will significantly help in clinical decision making. Second is whether the test is appropriate and acceptable for the patient. This involves careful discussion of risks and benefits based on the physician’s knowledge and experience and the patient’s values and preferences.

Shared clinical decision making

@#Most patients want to play an active role in their own health care. There is now a movement from medical paternalism to patient-centered care in the consultation process that is based on the therapeutic alliance and negotiation between the doctor and patient, aptly named “shared decision-making” (SDM). It is a process where doctors work together with patients, including their families and caregivers, to select tests, treatments, management, or support packages, based on clinical evidence and personal informed preferences, health beliefs, and values. Successful implementation of SDM is associated with improved quality of consultations, favorable patient-reported health outcomes, and increased patient and doctor satisfaction. Patients are empowered to make proactive health decisions resulting in decreased anxiety, faster recovery, increased treatment compliance, and reduced unnecessary health care expenditure. There are multiple existing models in facilitating SDM. Two simple and easyto-follow models are the “three-talk model” and “S.H.A.R.E. approach.” The three-talk model endorsed by the NICE divides the SDM consultation into three steps, namely: team talk (explaining the need to consider treatment options as a team), option talk (describing the alternatives in more detail, and making use of patient decision aids [PDA] whenever appropriate), and decision talk (helping patients explore and form their personal preferences). On the other hand, the S.H.A.R.E. approach promoted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is a five-step SDM consultation process that includes exploring and comparing the benefits, harms, and risks of each treatment option through meaningful dialogue about what matters most to patients.

Critical appraisal

@#Critical appraisal is the process of reading published research to make a judgement on its scientific value (validity), and to consider how its results can be applied in family and community practice (applicability). There are four main elements of critical appraisal in EBFP i.e., relevance, validity, results, and applicability. Some family practitioners are not so comfortable with appraisal because of their poor background in research. But we developed the guide questions for critical appraisal simple and provide advice on what and where to look for it in the published evidence.

Clinical pathway for the management of uninvestigated Dyspepsia among adults in family and community practice: Updated 2021

Background@#Uninvestigated dyspepsia is a common complaint in family practice in the Philippines. Patients usually seek consult due to severity of symptoms which affect their quality of life. The goals of management are short- and long-term symptom control, with reversal of possible underlying mechanisms, achievable through a combination of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions.@*Objective@#The main objective of this pathway is to guide family physicians and primary care physicians in the assessment, diagnosis and management of adult patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia through a shared decision-making process.@*Method@#This clinical pathway is an update of the PAFP’s Clinical Pathways for the Management of Dyspepsia in Adults (2016). The current panel utilized the ADAPTE method and prioritized reviewing relevant clinical practice guidelines from 2017 to present. Grading of recommendation was achieved through a mixture of strength of available evidence and a consensus from a panel of experts.@*Summary of Recommendations@#The main changes in the recommendations in this update are as follows: symptom-based classification of dyspepsia, screening for anxiety and depression, family and SCREEM assessment; initiation of therapeutic trial for most patients to whom H. pylori testing is not available; extension of initial PPI treatment to 4-8 weeks, consideration of antacids/alginates for immediate symptom relief, consideration of tricyclic antidepressants for non-responders to initial treatment; symptom-based non-pharmacologic advice, consideration of counseling and other psychosocial interventions; empowerment for self-treatment and as-needed therapy for those who have completed the initial treatment regimen@*Dissemination and Implementation@#This guideline shall be disseminated and implemented at the clinic and organizational level. It will be published in the “The Filipino Family Physician” journal, social media platforms and will be disseminated through PAFP local chapters, training institutions and during the national convention. Non-FCM primary care physicians will also be reached through relevant agencies. It shall be included in the references required during training activities and national exams of accredited training institutions, in coordination with the PAFP committee on Residency Training. It shall be incorporated in checklists for compliance in audits and QA cycles, with support from the PAFP committee on Quality Assurance and that on Standards for Family Practice. Feedback on utility and applicability will be actively sought from the intended users and other stakeholders.

The direct cost of autism and its economic impact on the Filipino family

@#<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Background.</strong> The increasing prevalence of autism has significantly impacted the health care spending of many families worldwide. To date, families from low to middle-income countries are burdened with out-of-pocket spending as their local health care systems have yet to incorporate autism-related services into the health care infrastructure.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Objectives.</strong> This study aimed to determine the direct costs of diagnosing and caring for children with autism and analyze its impact on the Filipino family.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Methods.</strong> The cross-sectional study consisted of a self-administered questionnaire that looked at parents' employment status, family income, and the direct costs for consultations, diagnostic tests, therapy, education, and medications. Study participants were parents living with their child diagnosed with autism, ages 2 to 6 years old at the time of the study.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Results.</strong> One hundred fifty-eight parents participated in the survey for the cost of care for children with autism. Sixty-seven (42.4%) of parents received government or subsidized medical services for their children's consultation and/ or intervention, while the rest went to private centers or hospitals. The total costs for all evaluations that confirmed the autism diagnosis ranged from ?1,356 to ?44,634 and averaged ?7,411.80 per child. Overall, the mean cost of interventions post-diagnosis, including therapy, education, medications, and developmental evaluations for the first year, was ?38,868 or ?3,239 per month (21% percent of the monthly expenditures for a household with an income of ?15,000/month). The total cost of care per child was closely related to the family's revenue in the sample population. Families with higher incomes also had higher expenditures for autism-related services.</p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Conclusion.</strong> Autism imposes a significant economic burden on Filipino families, particularly the minimum-wage household earners who spent a higher proportion of their budget (21%) on autism-related services. The wide range of total costs for the care of the children in the study may be explained by the wide variability of the expenses for the services, differences in access to services, socioeconomic status, and the wide variation in needs of children with autism due to the nature of the condition.</p>